In the literature: June 2026 highlights

Discover the recently published papers from our community!

Carpenedo, Linda and La Barbera, Luigi “An efficient framework for fully deformable finite element musculoskeletal spine modeling: development, sensitivity analysis, and validation” Journal of Biomechanics, 2026

Computational musculoskeletal models are fundamental tools for investigating spinal biomechanics. However, currently available approaches still rely on major simplifications. In particular, fully deformable finite element (FE) models capable of quantifying load-sharing across all spinal structures rarely incorporate the action of muscles. As a consequence, detailed predictions of internal loads deriving from realistic loading conditions still lack. This study integrates an active muscle architecture into a lumbar FE model using a multi-stage dimensionality reduction strategy, combining Plackett–Burman screening, Latin Hypercube, and Farthest Point Sampling, to develop surrogate Generalized Linear Models. These models, built on a reduced set of simulations, efficiently predict spinal kinematics as a function of muscle forces. Using these surrogates, an optimization procedure identified the muscle activations that satisfy kinematic targets while minimizing an energy criterion. The results accurately captured physiological trends: abdominal activations and intradiscal pressure increased with trunk flexion. Compressive forces (CFs) at L4–L5 in standing were 74 % of body weight, within the 58 %–98 % literature range. The model’s full deformability also allowed for a detailed load-sharing assessment. For instance, in standing, the disc consistently carried over 44 % of CFs, followed by facet capsules (FCLs) contributing up to 26 %. During flexion, disc load nearly doubled, while FCLs became markedly tensioned (reaching 49 % at 20°). Also, shear forces (anterior 31 % to posterior 17 % of body weight) matched literature values, with the disc providing the primary contribution. These findings confirm the model’s ability to predict complex loading patterns while reducing the computational cost of musculoskeletal FE simulations.

——————————

Lai, Juntong, and Damien Lacroix. “A novel integrative multi-scale framework of inflammation and mechanical loading in knee osteoarthritis.” Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 25.3 (2026): 55.

Obesity is a well-known prominent risk factor for knee osteoarthritis (OA). The onset and development of knee OA are affected by multifactorial interplays, involving the degeneration of articular cartilage. Emerging evidence shows the negative effects of obesity on cartilage degeneration across multi-scales. Specifically, obesity can stimulate inflammation and alter the biomechanical responses of the joint. However, the pathology of obesity-associated knee OA is still poorly understood. The aim of this study was to develop a multi-scale modelling framework to simulate and evaluate the mechanobiological roles of obesity in the degenerative process of cartilage. This framework integrated the inflammatory and biomechanical effects of obesity on cartilage degeneration in knee OA. A validated finite element model of a subject-specific knee joint was coupled with a mathematical model of adipokine-mediated OA inflammation. In the algorithm, excess stress resulted in mechanical damage that activated obesity-related inflammatory responses. The degeneration of cartilage was driven by both mechanical damage and body mass index (BMI). Parameter sensitivity analysis showed a good adaptivity of this framework to simulate cartilage degeneration. In addition, BMI and the stress threshold were sensitive to the degenerative process. Results indicate that a higher BMI level could not only increase the degeneration level but also lead to a larger degenerative volume of cartilage. Due to the elevated baseline of inflammation in the obese joint, the relative contributions of inflammation and mechanical damage might vary as cartilage degeneration progressed. This computational framework combines for the first time obesity-associated inflammation and mechanical loading in knee OA. It could be extended by specifying different degenerative pathways in cartilage degeneration. With further calibration, the framework has the potential to empower the identification of different phenotypes and endotypes of OA.

——————————

Killen, Bryce A., et al. “A predictive simulation framework for personalised in silico gait retraining in knee osteoarthritis.” Journal of Biomechanics (2026): 113409.

Gait retraining is typically performed with either a single, or small set of generic instructions which target a specific angle such as trunk lean or foot progression angle. These generic instructions may limit the ability of these interventions to effectively reduce knee joint loading magnitude, the ultimate goal of gait retraining. This aim of this study was to introduce and demonstrate a proof-of-concept predictive simulation framework for personalised gait retraining with an explicit implementation of reducing knee joint loading.
An existing open-source framework was adapted by first updating the musculoskeletal model to include medial and lateral contact points, and a detailed ligament structure. Second, the objective function was updated to (1) explicitly minimise the magnitude of medial and lateral compressive knee joint loading and (2) allow tracking of patient specific habitual gait kinematics.
Through a series of exemplar simulations the framework has been shown to be able to loosely track sagittal plane lower limb kinematics, reduce the magnitude of estimate knee joint contact loading verified through inverse simulations, and is sensitive to tibiofemoral alignment.
The adapted framework is capable of generating novel movement patterns which have been shown in silico to reduce the magnitude of knee joint loading and may be suitable for personalised gait retraining. Future studies will include assessment of feasibility of implementing generated gait patterns for gait retraining as well as potential longitudinal effectiveness of such approaches.
——————————
Marino, Michele, and Alessandro Mastrofini. “ERC Consolidator Grant VISTA: rethinking vascular inflammation through computational engineering.” (2026): ehag310.

Cardiovascular medicine has entered an unusual paradox: our ability to treat vascular disease has never been greater, yet our ability to predict who will benefit remains limited. The scale of cardiovascular disease makes this challenge particularly striking. Since 1990, the number of people living with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) has nearly doubled, now exceeding 600 million worldwide and making it the leading cause of death globally.1 In the European Union alone, cardiovascular disease imposes an economic burden exceeding €280 billion annually.2

At the centre of this challenge lies vascular inflammation, the biological process underlying most CVDs and a key driver of atherosclerosis. Despite major advances in prevention and treatment, cardiovascular care often intervenes late in the disease process, when vascular damage is already established and potential benefit becomes limited.

——————————

Nagawa, Juliet, et al. “Patient-specific in silico prediction of outcomes of partial continuous-flow LVAD treatment in peripartum cardiomyopathy.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering 42.6 (2026): e70188.

Patients with severe peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) often receive mechanical circulatory support with good outcomes. However, mechanisms underlying the functional improvements are poorly understood for patients with different PPCM characteristics. This study investigated effects of partial, continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support on cardiac function and mechanics in patients with different PPCM severity. Patient-specific biventricular finite element models of six patients with different PPCM severity were developed from magnetic resonance images and combined with a circulatory system model, including variable LVAD support. Ventricular function and myocardial mechanics were predicted and changes due to LVAD support were quantified. The LVAD support decreased LV myofiber stress and increased ejection fraction (EF). EF increased steadily (two patients), fluctuated (two patients), or peaked before a steady decrease (two patients) with increasing LVAD speed. Improvement due to LVAD support was greater for PPCM patients with higher disease severity than those with lower disease severity. The LVAD and native LV jointly generated stroke volume (SV) in four patients, and the LV contribution diminished with increasing LVAD speed. In the two patients with the lowest EF, the LVAD was the sole source of SV. The improvement of cardiac function and mechanics due to LVAD support in PPCM exceeds that reported for chronic heart failure due to ischaemia. However, the predicted variability of the LVAD benefits with PPCM severity and mechanical support level suggests the need and potential for further studies to guide clinicians in selecting personalised treatment parameters required for optimised LVAD therapy for each PPCM patient.

——————————

Marfoglia, Alberto, et al. “Challenges of health data standard adoption and usage: a systematic review.” Journal of Biomedical Informatics (2026): 105022.

To explore the adoption and practical implementation of the three major health data standards (i.e., FHIR, OMOP-CDM, and openEHR), to evaluate their maturity level in terms of how extensively they have been applied and integrated into everyday clinical and research practice.

——————————